Evan Furness vs Lukas Lacko Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L L L L
Form
L L W L L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Furness 1 - 0 Lacko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Furness winning 2 and Lacko winning 0. The last match between Furness and Lacko was at the Ostrava Challenger, 26-04-2022, First, Clay with Evan Furness getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Evan Furness | 1 |
| Lukas Lacko | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Evan Furness
Player
Lukas Lacko
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:1:47 | Average Match Time | 1:1:47 |
| 50% (28/56) | 1st Serve % | 44% (20/45) |
| 61% (17/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 61% (17/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 62% (28/45) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Evan Furness
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Evan Furness
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
114)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
114)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
57 of
72)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Oscar Lacides
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Lacko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 5-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Lukas Lacko
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
13
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Lukas Lacko
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Lacko
Player
Alexander Donski
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Marcora
Player
Lukas Lacko
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrej Martin
Player
Lukas Lacko
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Lukas Lacko
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
107)
6
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Lacko
Player
Alexander Ritschard
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Lukas Lacko
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Lukas Lacko
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
38 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (291/210) | Win/Loss | 55% (577/464) |
| 57% (642/487) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1361/1171) |
| 53% (5556/4949) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (12617/11895) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1171 | Aces Total | 4632 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1458 | Total Double Faults | 1611 |
| 1:25:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 483.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 589.02 |
| 62% (18886/30648) | 1st Serve % | 60% (30980/51540) |
| 67% (12685/18886) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (22550/30980) |
| 49% (5759/11763) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10575/20560) |
| 45% (1462/3221) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1689/4261) |
| 42% (12589/30274) | Return Points Win % | 36% (18391/51131) |
| 59% (285/485) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (537/951) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (34/81) |
| 51% (69/134) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (200/390) |
| 54% (75/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (181/342) |
| 87% (286/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (564/471) |
| 13% (286/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (564/93) |
| 20% (215/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (476/104) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
